Random thought
I prefer aggressive passion to passive aggression.
The emphasis is on the “etc.”
From Devin Faraci's review of Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film For Theaters: "Honestly, if George W. Bush could prove that Saddam Hussein had funded this movie I would reverse my stance on the Iraq War and say that every single civilian casualty was justified." The rest of the review is just as funny and shocking. From two positive reviews: "A second viewing with a joint in hand awaits to determine if it's the worst movie ever made or a fierce act of movie-film revolution." "The plot can't be summarized: Let's just say that crazy s--- happens, and occasionally, you laugh."
The House and Senate have each passed a bill that provides yet more money to fight the war in Iraq. Both bills include a requirement to end military involvement in Iraq by sometime next year. The votes were mostly along party lines—Democrats support the exit deadlines enough to provide more funding for an unpopular war while Republicans refuse the deadlines on principle. Bush promises to veto any bill with a deadline (but as usual when he does the right thing, he'll be doing it for the wrong reasons). Barack Obama has said that Congress will pass war funding without an exit deadline if Bush vetoes. So really this is a game of chicken, with Bush willing to gamble the money he wants for the war and Democrats openly willing to blink first and give Bush what he wants. Republican Ron Paul voted against the House bill not because it has an exit deadline but because it has war funding, and he'll vote against the next one for the same reason. It's a shame the Democrats aren't similarly principled on this issue. Congress is holding all the cards and essentially deciding to fold.